Sharon Stone Loses Custody
Friday, September 26th, 2008Bobby Rachpoot, PacificCoastNews
It is amazing how just one movie *COUGH Basic Instinct* can change a star’s career, life even, and no matter what successes or failures that Sharon Stone sees in her life, she will always be remembered from that one….quick…..frame. Here she was spotted visiting The Coffee Bean in Beverly Hills, and even still she is thronged by the paparazzi. But despite her popularity with the public, when it comes to the legal streets of California, she isn’t all that favoured. Unfortunately this week Sharon Stone lost custody of her oldes son, Roan, to his dad. Sharon had been seeking primary custody of Roan, but as Roan is currently living with her ex-husband Phil Bronstein, a San Francisco judge ruled that eight year old Roan should stay put where he is…permanently. It was ruled that Phil’s home was a more stable environment for Roan giving Phil executive sole custody. The court order reads as follows:
The court does not find that a move away is in child’s best interest. Court finds that Bronstein can provide a more structured continuity, stable, secure, and consistent home that child, Roan, needs. Bronstein shall have permanent sole physical custody of child
Sharon’s petition for full custody stemmed from the fact that she wanted Roan to live with her so that he could go to school in Los Angeles instead of San Francisco. And had she maybe waited for the move to occur between school years, perhaps she would have been successful because the court order did not feel that taking Roan out of school mid-year would be good for the sake of the child. Sharon however has two other children whom she has adopted on her own, Laird Vonne Stone who is three, and Quinn Kelly who is two, and she wanted Roan to be closer to her to bond with her other kids. But at the end of the day, there is to be no change in Sharon’s “custody, visitation, holiday and vacation schedule” and order that her telephone number is programmed into Roan’s phones. Awwww…poor Sharon. It’s always so sad to see any mother removed from her children. Perhaps hopefully this will change down the line, but it doesn’t look promising.







